
Courtesy of Mathew Jackson
In case you missed it this morning, Peter Abraham currently of the Boston Globe, formerly a Yankee beat writer for the Journal News, decided to write a surprisingly candid piece about how he has come to a decision in regards to the manner in which he will cast his Hall of Fame vote this year.
Why is this year so special? The 2013 ballot is the first one with two of the most well-known, most feared players of the past 30 years who also happen to be forever linked with steroid usage: Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens.
Instead of acting sanctimonious and saying that the Hall Of Fame should only have guys with “good” character enshrined, Abraham throws that sanctimony out the window and decides to say what others are afraid to say. That voting guys like Bonds and Clemens into the Hall of Fame should be a reflection of baseball history, that people can draw their own conclusions about the PED usage but that the Steroid Era did indeed happen, that it’s a part of the baseball timeline and that the players who happened to suit up during those years, shouldn’t be penalized for being in its periphery.
The Steroid Era is a part of that of history, too. There was a time in baseball when everybody — owners, players, management, the Players Association, media — looked the other way at drug use. It was generally accepted that a lot of players took steroids.
I thought it was pretty amazing of Abraham to do that. He also admits that at first, he was one of those guys who automatically left people off the ballot just because of their proximity to the Steroid Era.
In this piece, Abraham’s calling out his fellow writers by pointing out the hypocrisy but without really calling them out. Instead, he asks questions:
What of the guy like Andy Pettitte, who swears he tried HGH only briefly? Is he excluded when he gets in the ballot?
Are amphetamines OK because the players back in the 50s used them? Is Ryan Braun in or out because he figured out a loophole in the testing system last winter when he tested positive?
Of course, some of those other writers with Hall of Fame votes are still stuck on their high horses, worried about a black eye on the Hall of Fame which is kind of silly considering some of the people already enshrined in the Hall. Namely,
a child abuser. And to those same writers who are crying about the character clause, what about that? Child abuse is a pretty horrible mark against someone’s character, isn’t it? You all know the answer to that: Yes, it’s much worse than PED usage.
At the end Abraham finishes with this:
The Hall of Fame is a wing in a museum, a place to go learn about the game. PEDs were part of the game and my ballot will reflect that.
Hallelujah. A writer who finally gets it.
So bravo Peter Abraham for having the guts to go against the majority and speaking out in an honest, thoughtful way.