Chicago Cubs Friday Headlines: Meditations on Michael Bourn

I’ll be honest, I have scoured the internet tubes for Chicago Cubs news this happy Friday, and all I’ve been able to come up with is that the Cubs Wives are walking the runway for some charity or other.  Or something. Since I prefer not to gag this early in the morning, let’s talk about something else. Namely, Michael Bourn. And the fact that he’s still out there . . waiting.

Normally, I would say that the Cubs don’t have a chance in hell of landing Michael Bourn. But then Bruce Levine brought it up in his ESPN chat last Friday, and since then I’ve seen his name everywhere. So, just for the sake of a Friday argument, I ask you, LOHO Nation, these questions: 1) What would it take to get Michael Bourn; and 2) What would the Cubs do with him if they had him? I mean, what with all the fandare over signing Nate Schierholtz and, as I think we all know, we’ll get left field back when we pry it from Soriano’s cold, dead hands.

The guys over at Cubs Den did a really good job breaking down Michael Bourn (and yes, that’s the third time I’ve written “Jason” and had to delete it, in case you were wondering). Here are some of their highlights:

image Michael Bourn pros

And then it hits me . . . I’m pining away for a player with a .343 OPB. This is what I’ve been reduced to. This team gets on base so little that a .343 OBP is actually a huge step up.

I’m going to go cry in a corner for a while. Discuss.

Also, Cubs Con is coming up, and I guess we should talk about that. It’s going to be held, for the first time, at the Sheraton Hotel on the Chicago River. This is both good news and bad news, as the convention was desperately in need of more space (even after the last two years),  but it also really messes up my convention routine, which I had pretty much down pat. Anyone going?

 

Also on Aerys

DISCUSSION: 15 Responses

  1. Doc Blume says:

    Michael Bourn costs us a second round draft pick.

    That alone is reason enough not to sign him.

    If that isn’t reason enough for you (which it should be), Bourn’s agent is Scott Boras which means the club that signs him will likely end up paying over his actual value. As a result, he’ll probably be difficult to trade when we develop someone in the farm system to play in the outfield.

    I don’t see this as a particularly good signing for the Cubs right now. Speed tails off after thirty, which is the primary reason to sign Bourn. You would overpay for a player who will have decline in his primary skill (see Alfonso Soriano). On rare occasions, a player can retain a reasonable level of speed after 30, but that is pretty rare and I wouldn’t risk a 2nd round pick on that.

    Thumb up 0

    • Doc Blume says:

      I should qualify that previous comment with saying that early in the offseason I thought that Bourn might be an interesting fit for the Cubs…but after I looked over it all, I just didn’t see it being a smart move.

      All the FA players the Cubs have signed so far have been either placefillers or have not required draft pick compensation (Jackson). I expect the Cubs to continue down that path with any future signings.

      Thumb up 0

  2. Doc Blume says:

    Fangraphs has their 2013 ZiPS projections up for the Cubs.

    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2013-zips-projections-chicago-cubs/

    Thumb up 0

  3. Doc Blume says:

    Everyone is boring.

    Thumb up 0

  4. cubspsychologist says:

    I just don’t see it happening unless they trade
    Soriano. If they don’t, you might well place a headstone in left field that reades, “Here lies Alfonso Soriano, Left Fielder for the Chicago Cubs…and, yes, they Cubs are still paying his contract.” No ill-wishes are directed toward Soriano and this statement.

    Thumb up 0

  5. sloanpeterson2 says:

    Re-Cubs con. They don’t live-stream it on the internet do they?

    Thumb up 0

  6. juliedicaro says:

    Um . . why did we sign Dontrelle Willis?

    Thumb up 0

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.